Go to IIE Homepage
Login  |   My IIE  |   Contact Us   |   About IIE  |   Calendar  |   News  |   En Español
Institute of Industrial Engineers

Next Region 7 IIE Event
 

Join IIE and start working smarter!
Learn how IIE membership can provide vital resources and information to help advance your career. Learn more

Region 7 Banner
 
IIE Home > Region 7 Home > Current Newsletter

IIE Region 7 Current Newsletter


Region VII Newsletter

Region Web Page: http://www.iienet2.org/Chapter/region7/  Email:  rvp07@iienet.org


November 2007

Contents

General Notes                            Notes from IIE HQ         

Region VP Message                    Kaz IE Notes

Contact Info


General Notes 

  • Our Region web page changed addresses to http://www.iienet.org/region/western
  • 2008 Region Student Conference at Cal Poly San Louis Obispo is currently planned for March 7th and 8th.  Details are still being finalized with a pre-conference social event possibly planned for Thursday, March 6th at SLO’s famous ‘Farmers Market”.  I can personally vouch that SLO’s Thursday night Farmers Market is the ‘Best’ event of this type which I have experienced.  Trust me; you will have a great time.  For more information go to www.ime.calpoly.edu/clubs/iie
  • National Conference in Vancouver from May 17th – 21st  Go to http://www.iienet2.org/annual2/default.aspx
  • National IIE Award Nominations due by December 1st.  Go to www.iienet.org/honors

Chapter Management – Know your chapter health status

Every quarter IIE chapters receive a health status rating of Green, Yellow, or Red. The health status rating impacts a chapter’s ability to win IIE awards and to receive budget from IIE dues. Professional and student chapters have slightly different health status requirements, available through the IIE Chapter Management Center (professional chapter health | student chapter health).

The IIE Chapter Management Center provides a collection of tools that help chapter leaders to manage their local chapter activities including the IIE calendar, important forms, funding assistance, leadership development materials and many other resources: http://www.iienet2.org/Details.aspx?id=624.


Notes from IIE HQ

Hope all is well.  I have just returned from a meeting at IIE HQ with our other Region IE VP’s and wanted to share with you a few of the updates.

  • Don Greene, our Executive Director for IIE, discussed the IIE strategic initiatives and opening a satellite office in Mexico.  Don advised us how impressed he was with the development of IIE in Mexico and commented that the universities and lab’s were very close to what we would find in our own universities. He mentioned that Mexico graduated around 4,000 IE’s last year which is over double what we graduated in the US.  Don advised that the job market for them was also very strong with a multitude of factories representing most of our known companies.  Don also advised that China and Turkey are two additional countries which are worth watching on the international front in the upcoming years.
  • Another topic at the meeting was an overview of IIE’s six areas of strategic focus.  They included; Image of the IE Profession.  Education, Training and Knowledge.  Industry Participation.  Academic Involvement.  International Presence.  Network of Effective Volunteers.
  • An hour was dedicated to a topic near to our own, the Region Chapter model which all of you made possible.  For those of you who are new, our Western Region piloted the concept of including the “members at large” or IIE members which do not belong to a Sr. Chapter, and including them in our communications and Web conference calls.  From IIE-HQ’s post survey of our Region membership, the feedback which was received was positive with several comments noting that the ‘members at large’ welcomed the more direct communication.  Several of the other Regions have adopted our Region Chapter model and have reported similar success, especially when using the WebEx type of presentations within their state boundaries.  Let me pay everyone in our Western Region a personal thank you for supporting us on this pilot.
  • Discussion was also held on a few administrative items like succession planning, updates to the IIE HQ web site and improved communication.  Regarding succession planning, shortly you will all be receiving ballots to vote on my replacement.  When this is released, I highly encourage you to cast your vote.  Many of our Sr. Chapters will also be setting up their Chapter elections.  Consider volunteering for a support position within your local Chapter, I know that your service will be well appreciated.

Message from the Region Vice President

As all good IE’s, I find myself looking at continuous improvement opportunities and am often asked by IE students or entry level IE’s what do managers look for in an IE.  This led to a discussion among one of the IIE committees I serve on (Industry Advisory Board or IAB) which ultimately led to the IAB discussing plans to sponsor a track at the upcoming National Conference in Vancouver.  The details are being finalized but the basic track structure will focus on one theme with three elements feeding into it which involve what do manages look for when hiring or promoting IE’s in their organization and what IE leaders can do to develop and mentor IE’s to prepare them for promotions. 

To pilot this track, Cal Poly SLO is planning to have a discussion forum at our Western Region Student Conference with various industry leaders to discuss what managers look for in recruiting IE candidates from college.  We believe that this will be a great opportunity for both the Western Region students attending the event and the IE leaders in helping to prepare our future IE’s as they enter the work force.  The additional benefit will be to share the best practices from our Student Region Conference with IIE-HQ and our IAB to include the Vancouver Conference track which will be open to our Global IE partners.

If any of you who are industry leaders in IE would like to be considered for participating in either of these events, feel free to drop me a note. 

Let me also take a moment to remind you that our National IIE Award nominations are now going on.  At the Nashville Conference, one of the nominees which I recommended (Kathy Kilmer) won the Minority Achievement Award.  Even though Kathy was honored by her award, you could not take away the pride I had as I heard her name called out.  Many of us serve others in our own IE worlds and I know that many of you know of other truly outstanding IE’s who should be considered for the various National Awards but it takes someone like you to nominate them to get the process going.  If you have a name that comes to mind that would deserve this recognition, I encourage you to log onto www.iienet.org/honors  for more details and the various National IIE Awards that are available.  As a note, they are due before December 1st.

All the best.

Kaz


Kaz IE Note: Using 3 Sigma to help a non-technical operations manager support an IE analysis

I can bet that a few of you are thinking, what possibly could have happened to have a non-technical operations manager partner with an IE to support using a 3 sigma analysis. 

Background:

One of our clients came to us asking help in understanding what their optimal staffing should be for a 7x24 area support team.  The operating manager was not technical by any means and frankly was not strong in analysis but they were outstanding at managing their people, especially on a 7x24 coverage model.  The challenge came when they were asked to quantify what their staffing levels should be over the 7x24 period so they called on our IE team for support.

Situation:

After reviewing data on what drove their work, we discovered that the average support request was less than one per hour and that the average time to process the request was about one hour.  Typically this would have resulted in us recommending that our operating manager may only need to support one team for support request coverage over the 7x24 period.  What we knew though was that our operating manager actually had two teams scheduled and had very distinct memories of “I remember when we needed four teams for support”. 

This gap from the average of one team to four teams was our challenge.  How do we help our operating manager understand the difference from the ‘I remember when’ factor to what the data was telling us?

Resolution:

To address the operating manager concerns, we plotted their average support requests by hour which showed the average having one team would meet the average demand.  But we didn’t stop there.  We then plotted the max support requests to help them understand that we recognized that they did indeed remember correctly that on a few occasions when they needed four teams to respond to four calls in the same hour.  We then went one step further.  What were the needed support requests if they could respond to 95% of the requests at any hour?  To address that we went back and added a 3-Sigma data point and found that during their graveyard shift, 95% of the time they kept to under one service request but during 1st and 2nd shift they received over one service request per hour but did not exceed two. 

Since responding to service requests in a timely manner was our operating managers core responsibility, we were able to present a recommendation for an optimized staffing model of two teams for 1st and 2nd shift with 1 team on 3rd as their base team staffing coverage. 

In presenting this to our operating manager, we took them through our methodology and started with the 24 hour format layout.  We then reviewed his max requests per hour to help them validate their own thoughts and allow them to acknowledge that there had been four requests per hour as they remembered, but that it happened only a few times during the entire data sample of several years.  We then showed them what the average requests per hour were which they actually did know but started to go back to the max requests line.  At this point we introduced the 3 Sigma line and asked them how they would feel about meeting their service level if 95% of the time they would meet their service target. 

Our operating manager clearly understood that a base staffing of four was too high and they also understood that one was to low.  They also understood that they would be challenged on more than one support team based on the data.  By presenting the 3 Sigma approach, we completely achieved their support with the base staffing deployment and won the appreciation from their team to recognize their service commitments. 

For IE, it was a win, win with a bonus of one of our technical operating teams understanding how IE’s can use basic IE analysis to represent their operational and service level needs in a way which they would not have been challenged to present on their own.